Your session is about to timeout because of inactivity. Click Okay to extend your time and effort for an extra 0 minutes.
Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the precise duplicate of H4831. Bodily, it has a shorter grain sizing, as a result, the designation SC or small cut. The shorter, a lot more compact kernels allow the powder to stream throughout the powder actions extra smoothly, helping to alleviate the consistent cutting of granules.
It's probably that no more discussion is needed, where circumstance we propose starting off a whole new thread. If however you really feel your reaction is necessary you are able to even now accomplish that.
Minnesota H4831SC is my go to from the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am saving the small I have still left for slide 2021. I might get started very low and do the job your way up, based on what load data you have a look at for this combo the min/max loads are all around the board.
Novice to reloading. This will likely be employed for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I used to be capable of get my arms on a pair kilos of h4831.
Considering the fact that there isn't going to look like any "official" Load Data to choose from for this Load, can a few of you deliver a starting point with this mixture and things to consider when Functioning this Load up?
You could have to produce a few far more posts to obtain cleared to complete PM's. When you finally get to that standing I might publish from the classified reloading area to see if any individual is in your area to get a trade.
Like explained earlier mentioned, exact stuff. Everything differs is the size on the kernels. I did hear someplace that they are going to only make the SC Later on. I do not know if that is real or not but would seem sensible to me. I take advantage of SC due to the fact which is what I present in the 8 lb jug and it really works.
dioni.a.312 said: In my knowledge the only real actual change is that the shortcut meters superior through reloading products. Once It really is loaded theres no purposeful difference. I've listened to which the shortcut may have a small bit more quickly burn off rate but it seems insignificant. Click on to h4831sc develop...
It can be amusing how over the years loading many distinctive cartridges in a variety of rifles that I have not received appropriate end final results with H-4831 or perhaps the shorter-cut version.
VERIFY YOUR AGE Sure states prohibit advertising and marketing or marketing and advertising of firearms, ammunition, and associated firearm parts to minors. We’d like to make certain that you’re eighteen several years of age or older ahead of enabling you to buy our web-site. Have you been eighteen a long time of age or more mature?
Right after reading this text (and lots h4831sc of Many others, but this a single is easily the most data driven with many accredited shooters) I have stopped stressing about touching or getting inside of a magical distance through the lands, and began loading h4831sc load data in which I could improve multiple facets of a load. Just my .02, with any luck , you will get a thing to operate for ya.
Am i able to presume that H4831 is usually substituted for H4831sc ? I do know the physical variance but will it have an effect on the melt away or velocity? I do think not but I'm not a hundred% positive.
I discovered that my 7mag 160 partitions ended up sub MOA with 4831sc with minimal to min rates. I’m speaking 2700 (maybe 2800) fps, it had been a low 60s grain cost in a Norma scenario. Not what I was seeking, but accurate Nevertheless.
Comments on “Not known Details About h4831 vs h4831sc”